Monday, May 2, 2011

Revision Stations

The following are stations to help break up the work of revision. While not every station might apply to you, keep in mind that the more effort you put into the process the better off you'll be. The portfolio is a major grade.

Station One: Introductions

In your notebook, write a new introduction to your paper. This introduction needs to set up your content (topic) and context (type of analysis), thus allowing the essay to stand alone without the reader knowing the assignment.

Remember, an attention-getter needs to make the reader want to read the essay. Recall the different types of AGs we tried out in class:

Some Leads to Try

* Anecdote: a brief story that captures the essence of the issue or situation; painting a picture for the reader using vivid details


* Interesting fact: something that will really make the reader think (make sure it relates to your topic)

* Any sentence that really makes the reader want to continue reading.

* Question: should put the reader on the spot and make that person consider what the answer would be



Some Leads to Avoid, Please

* A dictionary definition (“Webster’s defines conformity as…”): that is boring

* A sweeping generalization

* A lead that isn’t focused (“Adoption programs in this country have some flaws. They aren’t completely bad, but they need to be dealt with. There are a couple of things I’m concerned about, even though, overall, adoption is a good thing.”): the reader is lost and confused before the writer has even started the essay




Station Two: Conclusions

In your notebook, write a new conclusion to your paper. This should wrap up your paper.

Some Conclusions to Try

* Instruction: what can the reader can do about the issue?

* Prediction: an insight into how the future could be different, better, or worse

* Anecdote: a brief story that reiterates the essence of the issue or situation

* What you learned: tell us what new understandings you came to by writing this paper

* Book-ending: circles back to the lead. Reread your introduction and connect your ending to it in some way (Don’t repeat the intro!).



Conclusions to Avoid

* Repetition of the introduction. We already read it. Use the conclusion as a space to say something new.

“Only rarely in effective writing is the closing a formal summary in which the person repeats … what has already been said.” --Donald Murray






Station Three: Layering

Read through your paper and the comments your readers have given you. Where do your readers want to know more? Pick one spot.

Now that you’ve picked that spot, write to fill in the gap. What do your readers want to know? Guided by their questions, write all of your thoughts on the topic for 5 minutes.





Station Four: Pruning

Like a good gardener, your job at this station is to prune your essay, getting rid of the weeds your readers can get tangled in when reading your paper.

OPTION A:

Read through your readers’ comments. Are there any places where they seem to be confused? Decide whether or not those confusing parts are necessary.

* If they’re necessary, try rewriting them and focusing on being specific, showing your readers what you mean and not just telling them (don’t write that Walter Scanlon was a good person—show us why he was a good person).

* If they’re not necessary, get rid of them!



OPTION B: Pick a page or paragraph to focus on, one that troubles you or your readers. Does that paragraph/page tie to the main focus of your paper?

* If it ties to the focus, how? How might you make it more clear to your readers? Try rewriting part of the page or the paragraph.

* If it doesn’t tie to the focus, pitch it!





Station Five: Slow down on a “hot spot”

Skim through your paper and find a place where you think you’re onto something (a page, a paragraph, even a sentence or two). It should be a place where you feel you express your ideas well and have a lot to say (if you can’t find a place on your own, review your readers’ comments to find out where they felt you were onto something).

Now write, for about 5 or 10 minutes, expanding on your ideas. What else do you have to say? How might you add more detail to further prove your point? Could you include more evidence? What else comes to mind? Write down everything you can.





Station Six: Using Evidence Meaningfully

Recall that:

Evidence = the facts or examples that back up your claims. Without evidence, a paper is merely unsubstantiated opinion.

STEP ONE: Find a place where you have used evidence from some source (personal experience, an interview, a reading, your research).

STEP TWO: Your role as a writer is like the role of a lawyer in a court of law. When you introduce evidence, you must tell the jury--your readers--why this evidence supports your argument.

Remember the formula: Introduce the evidence; Cite the evidence; Explain the significance of the evidence

STEP THREE: Check to make sure everything in your paper is set up well.







Station Seven: Reverse Outlining

Go through your paper as it is now and create an outline. You should clearly list the main focus of each paragraph and what the sub points are in those paragraphs.

If you cannot come up with a single main focus for each paragraph, you have an issue.

After looking at this reverse outline, figure out if this is the best way to arrange your ideas. Does your order allow the reader to logically follow what you are trying to say? Do any points require the reader to already know something? Is that information earlier or later?





Station Eight: Considering Comments

At this station, take out the all of the comments you received on this essay (peer comments, teacher comments, Write Place comments, etc.).

STEP ONE: Spend some time carefully re-reading the comments you received.

STEP TWO: Take out a piece of paper and write down some things you heard repeated. These can be good things (everyone loved your introduction) or suggestions (Did your peers and the teacher have questions about organization? Was there a paragraph, sentence, or page that confused many readers?).

STEP THREE: Think about how you might address these patterns. Is there a part you should definitely keep? Are there certain areas that need special attention?

STEP FOUR: Jot down a quick game plan for revision. What will you work on? Make notes for yourself on that piece of paper.

Sunday, April 24, 2011

LE3 Reader Review

As always, if you miss Reader Review in class, you MUST make it up on your own time. Have TWO people answer the following questions and take those comments into consideration for your revision.





Answer their questions:


How well does the writer analyze the rant? How well does the writer state his or her position on the rant?




How well does the writer utilize the book Real Writing? How well does the writer use the interview?



How well has the writer explained the grammar issue at hand?



Does the writer clearly state his or her position on the grammar issue? On the rant itself? Is it clear what the writer feels about these things?


Additional comments?

LE3 Checklist

The following is a checklist enumerating what exactly you must turn in to me for LE3. You are responsible for this information, as it appears on the second page of your syllabus. Any lack on your part will lead to the loss of credit. You must have every component in your packet. You will turn all of these components into me in a 2-pocket paper folder. Make sure everything is typed, and that the header clearly indicates what each item is. Refer to handout about formatting. Also, make sure everything is in the order listed here. Any deviation from this will lead to the loss of credit.



o Newly printed copy of your Long Essay typed and stapled. This will be 3-4 full pages and must conform to the formatting sheet I gave you.



o The copy of your paper that was used for Reader Review, including your cover letter, and including any comments from your reviewer


o Writing Exploration E with my comments



o The first copy of your interview


o Writing Exploration F with my comments


o The Rant






Remember, everything must be in your packet or else you will lose credit. If you did not get something in on time (such as a Writing Exploration) you must still complete it for your Long Essay Submission Packet. Otherwise, the submission packet is not complete and will be docked points.

Monday, April 18, 2011

LE3 Planning Questions

Based on all your materials, answer these questions as thoroughly as possible. That will provide you with much of what is needed for a completed LE3.


• What does your rant focus on specifically? What specific aspect of the rant (if there are multiple aspects) do you want to focus on in your LE3? Why?

• How does the ranter incorporate (or neglect to incorporate) evidence into his or her rant? What evidence specifically does he or she provide? What does this all tell you about the rant?

• What conclusions does the ranter make? What implications does he or she see for people who commit these errors? Is this a reasonable analysis?

• What does your research from Real Writing tell you? What does this source have to say about the grammar issues in the rant? What does the agreement or disagreement with the rant tell you about the grammar issue?

• Who did you interview? What about the interviewed person made you choose him or her for this assignment? What perspective is brought to the rant? Is it the same or different than the rant? The same or different than the textbook? How might you account for the answers to these questions, based on who you interviewed?

• How do these three things interact: rant, book research, and interview? What connections between the three do you want to focus on and expand for LE3?

• What is your opinion on the grammar issue at play in the rant? Has that opinion changed from before you found the rant? Has it changed since you read the research in the book? Has it changed since you did the interview? What about these three things (or your own knowledge) shapes your current opinion on the grammar issue? Were these three things well argued, or lacking in credibility? How so? What conclusions can you make about the grammar issue at hand?

• Based on this, what will your thesis be for your paper? How does this reflect everything you’ll be covering?